OK so here lately there has been a lot a folks accusing Barrack Hussein Obama of “flip-flopping” on a wide range of issues since winning the Dem nom. Well I would have to agree with them, but the one issue that affects me the most and makes me cringe to think he might be in charge, is Iraq.
For those of you who don’t know, I have been in the Army for over 11 years. In fact I just re-enlisted for 6 more years. With that re-enlistment I have all but secured my spot to go back to Iraq, that’s right go BACK. I was in Fallujah, Iraq in 2003-2004, I was attached to the 3rd ID, 3rd ACR, and the 82nd Airborne during my time there. I have seen my fair share of IED’s while in country, being as my unit were one of the first IED Hunters in country, in fact we pretty much wrote the doctrine that is being used now at this very minute. Anyways because of my time there and the fact that at some point in the next 6 years I will most likely be back at least once if not twice. So with this prospect, the idea that Barrack Hussein Obama might be the Commander in Chief scares the living s*** out of me!!!
This is a man who 1) has no experience to fall back on to be the President besides giving some speeches and looking good on the cover of Rolling Stone (which I will never read again!), 2) he has no experience in foreign relations, when he goes to state on TV that he would met with the leaders of Iraq, North Korea, Cuba, and Venezuela with out any pre-conditions show his lack of grasp on foreign matters. 3) The fact that since he “won” the Dem nom everything that he stood for during the primary race against Clinton, has changed, here is one example of many: thought the weapons ban in DC was constitutional, then when the Supreme Court said it wasn’t he agreed. But the biggest flop is his stance on Iraq.
He has stated in numerous speeches that he was against the war in Iraq in 2003 when he was a Sate Senator, well who gives a s***? You were a State Senator you had no say in weather or not we went to war in Iraq. States do not declare war on countries, the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States declare war! So to say that while as a STATE Senator you were against going to war as no merit besides you just proving that you are a left wing liberal that wants to use and abuse the freedoms that thousands of American troops have died for! Then when you finally get to the big state as a U.S. Senator you remain the anti-war liberal,which is fine everybody is allowed to have the opinion and for that thank a veteran. So he was sworn into the Senate on Jan 5 2005, and 13 months later he put his hat into the race for President. 13 Months!!! Are you kidding me?? You have 7 years as a state senator, and 13 months as a U.S. Senator and have the aducity to run for President!! The fact that now a 17 months after announcing your run for President you are trying to turn your campaign from the far left lane to the center lane, and to do this you are having to go against everything you stood for during the 16 month primaries! Now to get back on this topic, Iraq.
Barrack Hussein Obama (yes I use his middle name, does this make me a racist? NO its his name, if he doesn’t like it or if you don’t tough, I didn’t name him!), the fact that at the start of the primaries he was 100% against the war and that elected you would pull troops out as soon as you hit office. Then he came out with a bill in Senate that called for the troops to be out of Iraq by March 31, 2008 that was turned down. Then he came up with an idea to pull out 1 to 2 brigades out of Iraq in each month and have all of them out in 16 months, but he would leave enough forces there to guard the embassy and a counter-terrorist group as well. But hold the phone! Here it is July 2008, 3 1/2 months till the General election and he has all but switched his position.
Barrack Hussein Obama was everywhere in the beginning of 2007 and the end of 2006 saing the “surge” would not work, it was a bad idea to “double-down” as he state on the Meet the Press. Even in August of 2007, 2 months after the surge began (which if you are not in the military 2 months is not enough time to root out enemy forces from a country the size of Texas!), he came out saying the sure isn’t working and no matter what GEN Petraeus says in Sept, it does not matter the surge is a failure pull out now! Well let fast forward to June 2008, he is still on the surge isn’t working band wagon, but what a minute what is this I am hearing from the main stream media itself?? Oh the surge worked? The terrorists are all but destroyed? The Iraqi got has reached 16 out 18 objectives the Dem Congress put forth as part of the surge? But your President Nominee said it wouldn’t work and it isn’t working!! Oh wait a minute my bad he didn’t say that he told is that on the TV and the internet!
Good thing he never told us the surge wouldn’t work….oh what is that you say check youtube? Oh yea youtube the new way to check what a politician has really said abut an issue 17 months ago even though he cant remember, so this is what I found: its a lonf video but worth the watch
Now I am not a genius like Barrack Hussien Obama, but it appears to me he doesn’t even know where he stands on Iraq, in fact it make me think that his “change”means he will change his mind!!! Do yourself a favor look, read, watch, and listen to everything that is out there on both canadiates then make your choice, don’t just vote becasue you alwaysvoted for that party. The wrong choice in Nov might bring the “change” that this country may never be able to recover from.
OK so I have been sitting here and pondering the last few days. The more I ponder the more I get mad, the more I get mad the more I realize the problem needs to be fixed. The issues I have been pondering are numerous, but there are 2 that have really stuck out:
1. Oil/Energy Crisis
2. Term Limits
So lets talk about number 1. Oil and energy. There has been a lot of talk about oil and the energy here in this country here the last few weeks, we have been hearing from the left, from the right and each of them have had their opinions on how to fix the problem. But the thing that makes me made is the majority of the folks in Congress (guess which half!) do not see the obvious solution. DRILL!!!! I mean its not the best solution to conserve the environment, but for the situation we are in now, a shortage of oil, the cost of gas, it is the ONLY solution that makes sense and would actually work. How you ask?
Well lets start easy and work or way harder. Drilling would work faster and better for this country then relying on Congress and the folks trying to discover alternative fuels. Drilling for oil in ANWAR and off the costs of Florida and California would show results in 1 year, but if you listen to the left they say it will take at least 10 years for the oil to make a difference. Yet they say that alternative fuels, solar,and wind are the way to go to get off our dependency of foreign oil. I agree those things would, but how long will it actually take to have these things? How long will it take for me to have a gar that runs on electricity that can get me from Bentonville, AR to Memphis, TN (roughly 372 miles and 5 hours driving 70 mph), in one charge and get me there in 5 hours? How long Barrack Hussein Obama? Well I bet it will take over 1 year to get this working, in fact I would guess it would take up to 10 or more years!
Now some of you might think that drilling will hurt the environment! Well to that i would ask, when is the last time there has been an oil drilling accident in this country? I can not think of one, not one! The last oil accident that I can remember is the Exxon Valdez in Alaska back in the 80’s and that was a tanker running aground!! UPDATE: I have come across a list of oil accidents that you can find by going here.The technology that the oil companies use to drill make sure that oil spills are far and few between! Now some of you will say, ANWAR is a protected area, what about the mosquitoes that are protected there. My answers is are you serious? The size that the oil companies want to drill on is less then 1/2 of 100th o2 1%. That is 200o acres in an area that has over 1.5 MILLION acres!!!! I am not a math major but that seems to be a lot of lad with nothing on it, and a small area that the oil companies want to drill on. So this will then lead to the “well the oil companies have 68 million acres they aren’t drilling in!” Well first there is no oil there, so why would they drill there?? Second why don’t w do a swap, kind of like when you buy something from Wal-Mart but it is the wrong size you can swap it for the right size, lets swap 68 million USELESS acres, for 2,000 (that’s thousand) FULL OF OIL acres!! So this last point brings me to my 2 part of this blog, term limits!
2. Term Limits- I have blogged about this before you can find it here. In this post I go into a way that term limits can be put into place for Congress. Now the reason I bring this up is because Barrack Hussein Obama is running on the “change” and “hope” claims for the country. But this leaves the question for me, how can there be change in this country if the folks in Congress have been there for way to long? How can a career politician change things in Congress when he or she have been doing the same thing over and over for 20 or more years? This does not make sense to me, and if it make sense to you please explain it to me!
There have been members of congress, mostly the Senate (I will look into the House in another blog) that have been there for over 40 years! 40 freaking years, are you kidding me??!?!! According to wikipedia there are over 9 Senators that have served for over 30 years and 4 for over 40 years!!! How can there be change?? In fact there are 18 Senators that have served over 20 years, but only 39 have served under 8 years in the Senate. So 39 out of 100 have served the same amount of time as the President. That’s 2.5% of the Senate have served for the same amount of time or less then the President of the United States. Does this not bother anybody but me????
Now there have been instances that members have tried to put term limits in place but each time they have been voted down. The reasoning that is giver for no term limits in congress: “we have term limits it is called elections!” Elections in the eyes of the Congress are a way to enforce term limits! Yet when the 22nd Amendment was put into the Constitution by Congress it was OK, because we didn’t need a President to serve more then 8 years, after a Democratic President (FDR) was elected as President for 4 terms!
Here is the text of the 22nd:
Section 1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.
Section 2. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.
So basicly nio person can serve more then 10 years as President if that personfor some reason serves the alst 2 years of a precedding President, example Lyndon Johnson served the last 14 months of Kennendy’s term after he was killed and served on term as the elected President, had he ran for re-election and won he would have served for a little over 9 years. Now the reasoning for the 22nd? Well :
After Roosevelt’s death, the newly Republican 80th United States Congress desired to establish a firm constitutional provision barring presidents from being elected more than twice. The rationale was a concern that without limits, the presidential position could become too similar to that of a benevolent dictator lasting not just four years but a lifetime, and that the position could become too powerful and upset the separation of powers. Hence, the Twenty-second Amendment was adopted.
Back when Washington was President her could have served a third term but decided against this, in his farewell speech he claimed this was due to his age. So every other President after him stuck to the 2 terms out of respect to Washington. Now there have been some presidents that have tried to run for third terms prior to the 22nd, but none of them were successful.
So why are there not term limits on congress? Congress was suppose to be “by the people for the people”, but here in the last 50 years, it has been “for the politician by the lobbyists”!!! Instead of having the actual people of this country serving in Congress you have career politicians serving term after term after term! It is my opinion that if there were term limits alot of the problems and issues this country are facingtoday would not be there. There wouldn’t be an energy crisis, there wouldn’t have issuewith social security, issues with immigration! So please letme know what you think about this isse. Am I crazy for thinking this?
Here is a run down of the Senators that have served over 30 years:
Byrd, Robert (D) 49 years
Kennedy, Ted (D) 46years
Inouye, Daniel (D) 45 years
Stevens, Ted (R) 40 years
Biden,Joe (D) 35 years
Domenici,Pete (R) 35 years
Leahy, Patrick (D) 33 years
Lugar, Dick (R) 31 years
Hatch, Orrin (R) 31 years
Senators with over 20 years in service:
Levin, Carl (D) 29 years
Cochran Thad (R) 29 years
Baucus, Max (D) 29years
Warner, John (R) 29 years
Dodd, Chris (D) 27years
Grassley, Chuck (R) 27years
Specter,Alan (R) 27 years
Bingaman, Jeff (D) 25 years
Harkin, Tom (D) 23 years
McConnell, Mitch (R) 23 years
Kerry, John (D) 23 years
Rockefeller, Jay (D) 23 years
Shelby, Richard (D) 23 years
McCain, John (R) 21 years
Milkulski, Barbara (D) 21 years
Bond, Kit (R) 21 years
Reid, Harry (D) 21 years
Conrad, Kent (D) 21 years
So I was reading the Jawa Report, and came across this video. The video shows some of Hussein Obama’s supporters and there knowledge of the issues. It also showcases there knowledge on Obama’s accomplishments while in the Senate. It amazes me how stupid these folks are!
Now the most surprising part of the video happens at the 3:55 mark. In utter shock the biggest asshat in the world besides Obama, asks a question to a |Senator that gets no answer. Who is the asshat you ask: Chris Matthews, mind you this is the guy that made the comment: my legs feel all tingly for Obama. Enjoy!
Here is the original post: Jawa Report
Found this over at Hot Air, nice of the Democratic controlled Congress did all they could to insure that gas prices went down and lower our dependency on foreign oil!! Oops my bad what was I thinking? Gas prices haven’t gone down, in fact they have gone up by 30% since they took control!!! WTF!!!
I love the fact that the left wanted to “help” with the cost of gas a year ago this week, when in fact all they did was help with it increasing! But the one thing that really pisses me off and gets under my skin is the drilling for oil in this country.
According to the Dems. drilling now will not help the price of gas now, and that it will take up to 5 years to see an improvement in the cost of gas. So they want to put more effort into alternative sources of energy like solar, nuclear, and bio-fuels. But with the new technology to work it has to be developed and tested then put into the market, so that would take what, 10 years or more to get it totally right? Now I am not a math major nor did I graduate from College, but I know 5 years is less then 10 years, or am I wrong?
Now I know drilling now won’t stop me from paying $3.80 for a gallon of gas this week as I travel, but if we as a country start to drill and explore in more places I can almost bet you that the price of oil would fall. Why do you ask? Well the lovely foreign sources of oil will see that we are going to start to get our on oil and get scared, and when that happens all of the sudden they will start to produce more oil, which in turn will lead to lower gas prices! Hell just 2 weeks ago when Bush said he wanted to lift the hold on drilling off shore the Saudis got scared and started to produce more oil and the price dropped for the first time in weeks! Now I know the left doesn’t know how to use common sense about things and they feel that more govt is better and that electric cars are the answer to the energy crisis, but they need to wake up and smell the coffee!!!
Over 30 years ago a former President by the name of Jimmy Carter said that the energy policies of this country need to “change”(there is that word), and we need to be less dependent on foreign oil in this country. But as President there where oil shortages in this country which lead to long lines at the gas pump when gas was there! Now here it is 2008 and we have a Dem running for President that is much more left the Carter ever was, Barrack Hussein Obama(yes I used his middle name, does that make me a racist? The fuck if I care! Its his name get over it!), who wants to solve the energy crisis in this country just like Carter did, oops tried!
Now don’t get me wrong I am all for getting away from oil and using better sources of energy like nuclear or electric power, but how does something that is still in development and won’t be ready for at least a decade or more going to help me now?
The gas tax holiday proposed by McCain is still a good idea in my opinion, give us a few months with lower gas prices while the oil companies start to drill in ANWAR or off the shore of Cali or Florida! Give us a break while they build more refineries in the country, something that hasn’t been done in over 25 years! Let the oil companies drill, don’t tax them more like Hussein wants to do. Does he not realize who will pay those taxes? Not the oil companies, the average American will! But I guess when you are a Senator running for President riding around with Secret Service agents in govt vehicles you don’t have to worry about the price of gas, because it isn’t coming out of your pocket!
There is an idea, how about the Presidential candidates pay for their own gas in there SUV’s they ride in everywhere that go, including the gas for all of the trail vehicles in their convoys, and the plane they fly in all over the place, Then do you think Hussein will want that tax holiday at the pump? Will the ass-hats in Congress do something about the prices if they had to pay for gas as they travel?? Well maybe in a perfect world it would!
Oh and I think Pelosi and Reid need to be put on trial for treason, but that is another story that I will get to later!
Part of the text from Hot Air:
In May 2007, Nancy Pelosi announced amid great fanfare that the Democrats had made July 4, 2007 Energy Independence Day. Castigating George Bush for his inaction on energy policy, Pelosi noted that gas prices had reached record levels and that the newly-enacted Democratic majority would take charge of energy policy to take back the leadership from “Big Oil”. Pay close attention to the chart behind Pelosi at the beginning:
Here is the video from Hot Air: